Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | Next revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
| 0.8.4:pbr-material [2022/06/17 09:46] – [Normal Mapping or Parallax Occlusion Mapping] admin | 0.8.4:pbr-material [2022/06/17 09:47] – [Normal Mapping or Parallax Occlusion Mapping] admin | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
| If you want to know more about parallax occlusion mapping, have a closer look at the [[pom-material|TGorillaPOMMaterialSource]] | If you want to know more about parallax occlusion mapping, have a closer look at the [[pom-material|TGorillaPOMMaterialSource]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Comparison ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Let's have comparison on the rendering results for our specific example. | ||
| + | |||
| + | __Remark:__ Because parallax occlusion mapping is more intense to GPU computation use it carefully. In most cases normal mapping is still good enough. | ||
| + | |||
| In the image below the material was rendered with parallax occlusion mapping, which is much slower than normal mapping but producing a better depth effect. | In the image below the material was rendered with parallax occlusion mapping, which is much slower than normal mapping but producing a better depth effect. | ||
| Line 51: | Line 58: | ||
| {{: | {{: | ||
| - | |||
| - | __Remark:__ Because parallax occlusion mapping is more intense to GPU computation use it carefully. In most cases normal mapping is still good enough. | ||
| ===== Example ===== | ===== Example ===== | ||